Framework: HITRUST

Monitoring and alerting complement the logging function by transforming raw data into actionable security intelligence. Under i1, organizations are expected to maintain defined thresholds, escalation paths, and response procedures for detected anomalies. Candidates must understand that monitoring includes both technical and procedural layers—automated alerts for critical events and human review for contextual analysis. HITRUST evaluates whether organizations can demonstrate timely detection and response to security incidents through documented evidence of alerts, tickets, and follow-up actions.

Operationally, this may involve SIEM dashboards, intrusion detection systems, or managed security services that analyze event trends. For exam readiness, candidates should know how monitoring ties to PRISMA’s “Measured” level—demonstrating that controls are observed, evaluated, and adjusted based on performance data. The i1 assessment validates that organizations not only collect information but also act upon it effectively. Monitoring maturity ensures early identification of threats, reducing potential impact and supporting continuous improvement of the overall security posture.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.